<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My New York Times essay on quantum computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871</link>
	<description>The Blog of Scott Aaronson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:00:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explaining Quantum Computing – Blogroll Memory Hole Rescue &#124; Wavewatching</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-49419</link>
		<dc:creator>Explaining Quantum Computing – Blogroll Memory Hole Rescue &#124; Wavewatching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-49419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] than mine have been struggling with this conundrum.  For instance, a while back Scott Aaronson described his struggle to write a column for the New York Times that describes Quantum [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than mine have been struggling with this conundrum.  For instance, a while back Scott Aaronson described his struggle to write a column for the New York Times that describes Quantum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /:set\AI</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-37665</link>
		<dc:creator>/:set\AI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-37665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wolfram&#039;s view of QM is not simply that it is wrong- but rather that QM is the result of a particular kind of mobile automaton that builds a causal network in which nodes are updated one-at-a-time so time and space are emergent and invariant of the computer&#039;s operations-  observers INSIDE this computation can observe &#039;spooky action&#039; parallelism/ superposition/ entanglement/ etc since their universe is essentially frozen while updates are being applied- so QM is what a classical network built from recursion one-node-at-a-time looks like from the INSIDE- at least that is how I interpret Wolfram&#039;s speculation- in this context a quantum computer [or quantum universe] is more powerful because it harnesses more of the bulk operations of large regions within causal network instead of being confined to using only the nodes on the &#039;surface&#039; at the leading edge of the output]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfram&#8217;s view of QM is not simply that it is wrong- but rather that QM is the result of a particular kind of mobile automaton that builds a causal network in which nodes are updated one-at-a-time so time and space are emergent and invariant of the computer&#8217;s operations-  observers INSIDE this computation can observe &#8216;spooky action&#8217; parallelism/ superposition/ entanglement/ etc since their universe is essentially frozen while updates are being applied- so QM is what a classical network built from recursion one-node-at-a-time looks like from the INSIDE- at least that is how I interpret Wolfram&#8217;s speculation- in this context a quantum computer [or quantum universe] is more powerful because it harnesses more of the bulk operations of large regions within causal network instead of being confined to using only the nodes on the &#8216;surface&#8217; at the leading edge of the output</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrtucci</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36355</link>
		<dc:creator>rrtucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wittiest thing I&#039;ve heard was said by the Irish Times:
&quot;The God Particle May or May Not Exist&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wittiest thing I&#8217;ve heard was said by the Irish Times:<br />
&#8220;The God Particle May or May Not Exist&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36323</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Masami #49:

&lt;ul&gt;Hey, Scott, write something intelligent, witty, and totally revelatory about the the Higgs announcement. Right NOW.&lt;/ul&gt;

Sorry for the delay! :-)  See my comments on Lipton and Regan&#039;s blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/the-higgs-confidence-game/#comment-16554&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Masami #49:</p>
<ul>Hey, Scott, write something intelligent, witty, and totally revelatory about the the Higgs announcement. Right NOW.</ul>
<p>Sorry for the delay! <img src='http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   See my comments on Lipton and Regan&#8217;s blog <a href="http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/the-higgs-confidence-game/#comment-16554" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sidles</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36138</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sidles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In other&#160;&#8212; very welcome&#160;&#8212; quantum news, &lt;i&gt;The Quantum Pontiff&lt;/i&gt; has sprung to life with &lt;a href=&quot;http://dabacon.org/pontiff/?p=5728&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aram Harrow&#039;s live-blogging of QIP 2012&lt;/a&gt;.  Plenty of outstanding results, admirably summarized. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other&nbsp;&mdash; very welcome&nbsp;&mdash; quantum news, <i>The Quantum Pontiff</i> has sprung to life with <a href="http://dabacon.org/pontiff/?p=5728" rel="nofollow">Aram Harrow&#8217;s live-blogging of QIP 2012</a>.  Plenty of outstanding results, admirably summarized. <img src='http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdf</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36107</link>
		<dc:creator>asdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh boy, for those still looking to say snarky things about S. Wolfram, he&#039;s now associated with this conference about the brain being more powerful than a Turing machine:

http://www.producao.ufrj.br/hai2012/index.html

I had thought that his cellular automata stuff was classical computation, so I don&#039;t know his angle on this hypercomputer stuff, which is completely bogus as far as I can tell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, for those still looking to say snarky things about S. Wolfram, he&#8217;s now associated with this conference about the brain being more powerful than a Turing machine:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.producao.ufrj.br/hai2012/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.producao.ufrj.br/hai2012/index.html</a></p>
<p>I had thought that his cellular automata stuff was classical computation, so I don&#8217;t know his angle on this hypercomputer stuff, which is completely bogus as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masami Aomame</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36103</link>
		<dc:creator>Masami Aomame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-36103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Scott, write something intelligent, witty, and totally revelatory about the the Higgs announcement. Right NOW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Scott, write something intelligent, witty, and totally revelatory about the the Higgs announcement. Right NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Sterling</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-35991</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Sterling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-35991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off topic: this hit my feed, and I thought you might want to know about it.  He seems to quote you fairly well, though he typos your last name.

http://theastronomist.fieldofscience.com/2011/12/first-quantum-computer.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic: this hit my feed, and I thought you might want to know about it.  He seems to quote you fairly well, though he typos your last name.</p>
<p><a href="http://theastronomist.fieldofscience.com/2011/12/first-quantum-computer.html" rel="nofollow">http://theastronomist.fieldofscience.com/2011/12/first-quantum-computer.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aris</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-35919</link>
		<dc:creator>aris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-35919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the lecture as a formal paper.

http://ntp.neuroscience.wisc.edu/faculty/fac-art/tononiconsciousness.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the lecture as a formal paper.</p>
<p><a href="http://ntp.neuroscience.wisc.edu/faculty/fac-art/tononiconsciousness.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ntp.neuroscience.wisc.edu/faculty/fac-art/tononiconsciousness.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aris</title>
		<link>http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-35917</link>
		<dc:creator>aris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=871#comment-35917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[57:44+ ... &quot;... learning by exposure to a world which is even richer than we are.&quot;

Would Emily Dickinson agree?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>57:44+ &#8230; &#8220;&#8230; learning by exposure to a world which is even richer than we are.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would Emily Dickinson agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
